AI Coaching System Requirements Builder | AI Coaching Systems Review

How to use it

Select only the decisions that are inside the current review. The result is a preparation list—not a product recommendation, score, or proof that a particular AI use case should proceed.

Application and coaching mode
Is AI assisting a coach, coaching a participant, simulating a conversation, nudging behavior, or combining modes? Required evidence: User journeys, model roles, human roles, feature boundaries, and mode-specific contracts.Coaching method and content provenance
What professional or behavioral model shapes the interaction and who governs it? Required evidence: Named framework, content owners, versioning, expert review, prompt and knowledge controls, and known limits.Data flow and confidentiality
What does the system ingest, infer, retain, share, and expose to coaches or administrators? Required evidence: Data-flow diagram, notices, legal roles, subprocessors, model terms, retention, deletion, export, and aggregation thresholds.Safety, boundaries, and escalation
How does the system respond when coaching is unsuitable or a person discloses harm, crisis, discrimination, legal, medical, or employment issues? Required evidence: Boundary language, detection tests, escalation paths, human availability, incident logs, and prohibited use.Validation and outcome evidence
Which population, intervention, comparison, measure, period, and outcome support each claim? Required evidence: Protocol, sample, denominator, attrition, instruments, analysis, limitations, and independent replication status.Organizational configuration without surveillance
How are company values and priorities reflected without exposing private conversations or turning coaching into performance monitoring? Required evidence: Configuration fields, admin views, reporting definitions, aggregation, consent, access, and prohibited secondary use.Workflow and identity integration
Where does coaching appear and what data or actions flow through HRIS, collaboration, calendar, email, and identity systems? Required evidence: Integration scopes, permissions, triggers, write actions, logs, reversibility, and offboarding.Accessibility, language, culture, and user control
Can the intended population understand, use, contest, pause, correct, export, and leave the experience? Required evidence: WCAG evidence, languages tested, cultural review, accommodations, controls, opt-out, correction, and support.

Select one or more decisions to create a role-specific review list.

What the result does not do

The utility does not rank providers, determine legal or professional requirements, establish security or performance, calculate return, or replace accountable executive judgment. It helps a team state what it is evaluating and which evidence questions belong in the next review.